Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

June 18 2017

3662 c903 400
Reposted fromqb qb
3677 b8b3 400
Reposted fromuoun uoun
2664 a3f7 400
Reposted frombeer beer viaAMPLIDUDE AMPLIDUDE
7691 6825 400
Reposted fromtoxicpixie toxicpixie vialost-in-space lost-in-space
9081 c1cf 400
Reposted fromlol69 lol69 viastonerr stonerr
1746 ae4e 400
Reposted fromslodziak slodziak vianastypsychotic nastypsychotic

June 17 2017

2809 b96f 400
Reposted fromfelicka felicka
4479 4b64 400

bubble-snowflakes:

lamp  //  discount code: Joanna15

Reposted fromarixatos arixatos viamajenki majenki
6060 91a2 400
Reposted fromspring-flow spring-flow viaciarka ciarka
1986
Reposted fromzdzislaw-beksinski zdzislaw-beksinski
2204 3518 400
Reposted fromhagis hagis
0200 d094 400

June 16 2017

8247 f597 400

connorbell:

Pulse Prism 01 // part of a gif series collab with Cabbibio. 
http://cabbi.bo/

Reposted frompsyolopher psyolopher viastonerr stonerr
6028 1434 400

jordanparrished:

So somebody on my Facebook posted this. And I’ve seen sooooo many memes like it. Images of a canvas with nothing but a slash cut into it, or a giant blurry square of color, or a black circle on a white canvas. There are always hundreds of comments about how anyone could do that and it isn’t really art, or stories of the time someone dropped a glove on the floor of a museum and people started discussing the meaning of the piece, assuming it was an abstract found-objects type of sculpture.

The painting on the left is a bay or lake or harbor with mountains in the background and some people going about their day in the foreground. It’s very pretty and it is skillfully painted. It’s a nice piece of art. It’s also just a landscape. I don’t recognize a signature style, the subject matter is far too common to narrow it down. I have no idea who painted that image.

The painting on the right I recognized immediately. When I was studying abstraction and non-representational art, I didn’t study this painter in depth, but I remember the day we learned about him and specifically about this series of paintings. His name was Ad Reinhart, and this is one painting from a series he called the ultimate paintings. (Not ultimate as in the best, but ultimate as in last.)

The day that my art history teacher showed us Ad Reinhart’s paintings, one guy in the class scoffed and made a comment that it was a scam, that Reinhart had slapped some black paint on the canvas and pretentious people who wanted to look smart gave him money for it. My teacher shut him down immediately. She told him that this is not a canvas that someone just painted black. It isn’t easy to tell from this photo, but there are groups of color, usually squares of very very very dark blue or red or green or brown. They are so dark that, if you saw them on their own, you would call each of them black. But when they are side by side their differences are apparent. Initially you stare at the piece thinking that THAT corner of the canvas is TRUE black. Then you begin to wonder if it is a deep green that only appears black because the area next to it is a deep, deep red. Or perhaps the “blue” is the true black and that red is actually brown. Or perhaps the blue is violet and the color next to it is the true black. The piece challenges the viewer’s perception. By the time you move on to the next painting, you’re left to wonder if maybe there have been other instances in which you believe something to be true but your perception is warped by some outside factor. And then you wonder if ANY of the colors were truly black. How can anything be cut and dry, black and white, when even black itself isn’t as absolute as you thought it was?

People need to understand that not all art is about portraying a realistic image, and that technical skills (like the ability to paint a scene that looks as though it may have been photographed) are not the only kind of artistic skills. Some art is meant to be pretty or look like something. Other art is meant to carry a message or an idea, to provoke thought.

Reinhart’s art is utterly genius.

“But anyone could have done that! It doesn’t take any special skill! I could have done that!”

Ok. Maybe you could have. But you didn’t.

Give abstract art some respect. It’s more important than you realize.

Reposted fromziyoxis ziyoxis viaciarka ciarka
6471 7aa1 400

tastefullyoffensive:

This company understand dogs. (via jpellizzi)

June 14 2017

June 13 2017

Vincent van Gogh visited Jupiter, here's proof.
Reposted fromastronomygroup astronomygroup viaciarka ciarka
4317 c86c 400
Reposted frommisterpeter misterpeter viaciarka ciarka
1532 c6d6 400
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl